| “AIM” FOR
THE WORLD’S MOST SUCCESSFUL GROWTH MARKET -- the Alternative
Investment Market (AIM), the junior market of the London
Stock Exchange, is a compelling choice for US companies wishing
to access international capital markets.
The feature article below, co-authored by
Adam Hart, Head of Business Development, KBC Peel Hunt Ltd.,
London, and Gerald Turner, a FOCUS Partner, candidly describes
why US firms with market caps of $10-100 million can benefit
by raising capital in London.
In addition to his position with KBC Peel
Hunt Ltd., Adam Hart is Chairman of the London Stock Exchange’s
AIM Advisory Board.
Prior to joining FOCUS, Gerald Turner co-founded
and chaired Potomac Capital Group, LLP, and for over ten
years, was active in the MBO/MBI arena in the UK. He also
served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and
then Executive Vice President, Tarmac America Inc., a $600
million division of UK-based Tarmac PLC where he raised over
$100 million for the UK parent from divestitures.
Please feel free to forward this newsletter
to friends, colleagues, and networking contacts. (Go to www.focusbankers.com
for newsletter archives.)
Active
FOCUS Deals
With over 25 years of experience across many
verticals, FOCUS currently has nearly 60 active transaction
engagements in its four offices in Atlanta, Chicago, San
Francisco, and Washington, DC in the following specific business
sectors.
- Asset Management
- BioScience
- Building Materials
- Business Process Outsourcing (multiple
assignments)
- Business Services
- Call Center Software and Services
- Construction (Infrastructure)
- Consulting
- Distribution
- Electrical Transmission Equipment
- Energy
- Financial Services
- Food Processing
- Food Service Management
- Government Contracting (multiple assignments)
- Healthcare Business Services
- Home Automation
- Information Management
- IT Outsourcing (multiple assignments)
- IT Services (multiple assignments)
- Library Services
- Manufacturing
- Maritime Shipping
- Market Research
- Media
- Medical Devices (multiple assignments)
- Medical Diagnostics
- Medical Staffing
- Oil & Gas
- Security
- Software (multiple assignments)
- Sports Apparel
- Transaction Management Services
- Transportation
- Truck/Transport Capital Equipment
Our transaction process provides us with up-to-the-minute
market knowledge in these sectors. Are any of them of corporate
development interest to you? Give us a call or drop us a
note.
Inquiries should be addressed via e-mail to info@focusbankers.com,
by telephone to 202-470-1973 or by fax to 202-785-9413.
All
About AIM: London Stock Exchange's Alternative Investment
Market
By Adam Hart, Head of Business
Development, KBC Peel Hunt Ltd.; and Gerald Turner, Partner,
FOCUS Enterprises, Inc.
London Stock Exchange’s Alternative
Investment Market (AIM) has been around since 1995, but until
a couple of years ago virtually was unknown in the US. Now,
AIM is beginning to attract serious attention from US companies,
with a record number of American firms considering as an
alternative the AIM market as a means of raising capital.
Just as we take our products international, why not take
our capital raising international also?
AIM -- the World's Most Successful Growth
Market
AIM is not just a market for IPOs. It also
is a market where companies will come, to raise money. And
about one-third of the total sums raised on AIM have been
raised for secondary issues.
To date, 2005 was the largest year that AIM
has experienced. In 2006, the number of IPOs tailed off towards
the end of the year, as the market has dealt with a certain
amount of indigestion. By the end of October 2006, 371 companies
had gained admission. What’s very interesting in 2006
is that the average size of companies listing on AIM is significantly
higher than in previous years. And so, they say in London
that AIM is coming of age.
AIM: Key Statistics
- AIM Companies: 1,582
- Overseas AIM Companies: 286
- Capital Raised* Since 1995:
US$68 Billion
- Capital Raised* in 2005: US$16
Billion
*New and Further
|
AIM, a growth company market, is set up with a new type
of regulation, including a set of rules appropriate for assisting
growth companies. Regulation is delegated to a group of advisors,
investment banks, and broking organizations called Nominated
Advisers or “NOMADS.” that are responsible for
confirming the eligibility of companies on the market. NOMADS
also ensure that companies maintain the highest standards
of corporate governance appropriate for institutional and
retail investment.
AIM Regulation Emphasizes Flexibility
While there is no minimum size, for an institutional
IPO, something like $30 million probably is a minimum. Also,
no trading record is required which means that companies
can be dreamt up in the bath six weeks ago and IPO’d
quite readily, if investors can be found to take them. In
addition, no minimum numbers of shares is required to be
in public hands, although it generally is recommend that
for an institutional IPO; about 25 percent is a minimum level
of shares to be in the public hands.
AIM's Flexible Regulation: Admission
Rules
- No minimum size for admission
- No trading record required
- No minimum amount of shares
to be in public hands
- In most cases, prior shareholder
approval not required for transactions
- Admission documents not pre-vetted
by Exchange but by Nominated Advisor (NOMAD)
- NOMAD required at all times
|
What really assists AIM companies in their
growth is the lack of additional documentation that must
be supplied. AIM companies do not have to go back to shareholders
unless they’re doubling their size through an acquisition.
Also, they do not have to go to shareholders unless they’re
disposing of more than 75 percent of their assets. And most
importantly, if they want to raise more capital, they do
not have to go back to shareholders -- providing that they
have the appropriate approvals in place.
Flexibility of Rules Equals Opportunity
In London, if an AIM company is competing
against a listed company for the same acquisition target,
the AIM company can move much faster. Plus, the target company
may prefer going with an AIM company versus a listed company
because of the significantly greater amounts of documentation
that need to be produced and filed in dealing with a listed
company.
One of the key elements here is that an AIM
company is required to maintain a NOMAD at all times. Like
any market, AIM does have regular, continuing obligations:
announcements of price sensitive information are required;
when appropriate, AIM has directors’ dealing rules;
and semi-annual reporting is required. Most important, AIM
company directors must accept full responsibility for complying
with AIM rules.
AIM Rules: Continuing Obligations
- AIM companies must have a NOMAD
at all times, otherwise they will be suspended
from the market
- AIM companies must disclose
all price sensitive information in a timely manner
- Half-yearly and annual report
and accounts required
- All directors accept full responsibility,
collectively and individually for the AIM Rules
- Restrictions on deals for directors
and applicable employees on AIM securities during
close periods
- UK Corporate Governance standards
|
If an AIM company is seeking institutional
investment, then we recommend the highest possible standards,
because institutions generally do not look at an AIM company
in any way different from a listed company. They almost are
market neutral. So, in London, this means going for the top
level of corporate governance reporting, with corporate governance
a matter of negotiation with a NOMAD.
The size of AIM companies tends to be significantly
smaller than typical in US public markets. While a number
of companies on AIM are over $1 or even $2 billion, the majority
of AIM companies are very small. AIM also is a market which
covers all business sectors.
AIM Places Your Company in an International
Context
In fact, there are several excellent reasons
for the high degree of interest in AIM today. In a relatively
constrained venture market, AIM offers an interesting alternative
to a second or third round financing. This is particularly
true if your market is not well served by proximity to venture
capital. AIM is not geographically constrained by the “two
hour rule” which governs the thinking of much of the
venture world.
Entry is relatively straightforward which
is reflected in its associated timing -- four months from
beginning to end. A comparison might be the length of an
average venture capital raise -- nine months. Finally, there’s
the high likelihood that a small company’s voice will
be heard on an ongoing basis, post-listing. You stand a better
chance of not being relegated to the sidelines by much larger,
better promoted companies.
Why Choose AIM?
- The world’s most successful
growth market
- An internationally focused,
professional investor base
- Comprehensive research coverage
for international companies
- A more flexible approach to
regulation
- Better value than NYSE or NASDAQ
|
FOCUS Can Steer US Companies Through a
Successful AIM Listing
US firms with market caps of $10-100 million
can benefit by raising capital in London. To make the effort
worthwhile, your company should have an equity value of at
least 10 million pounds. Overall, while the AIM listing process
is speedy and productive, it is not a bargain basement and
your total costs will be not dissimilar to an assisted venture
raise in the US.
As part of our Transatlantic practice, FOCUS
has been monitoring the progress of the AIM market for some
time. In the process, we have developed good relationships
with a number of leading NOMADS and other service providers
who cater to the AIM market. As a result, we have established
an element of our practice in which we consult with companies
at an early stage as they are investigating whether AIM is
potentially a good fit.
As the listing process proceeds, we provide
an interface between a company and various agents in the
UK. The listing timetable is short and, as a corollary, it
is intense. FOCUS helps to minimize the distractions at a
critical time for your business.
To find out
more about how FOCUS can help you in this undertaking,
contact Gerald Turner, FOCUS Partner, in the Washington
DC office at 202 470 1972 or via email at gerald.turner@focusbankers.com.
Just
Released: New FOCUS Sector Intelligence Report on Homebuilding
and Construction Industry
Selected Transactions 2006-2007
Consolidation in the homebuilding and construction
industry continues to accelerate. In this new research-based
Sector Intelligence Report, FOCUS identifies some key drivers
of change that are driving new challenges for competitors,
suppliers, and subcontractors.
Available exclusively from FOCUS, the new
Report concludes that smart companies with strong balance
sheets; good cost controls; and scaleable technology and
management systems will find a multitude of opportunities.
ORDER YOUR COPY TODAY: Address
your request via e-mail to info@focusbankers.com or
call Karen Kramer at 202-470-1973 to request your personal
copy.
RECOMMENDED
READING:
Why is Cultural Harmony So Elusive?
In the September 2006 issue of Mergers & Acquisitions,
Dr. Jean-Francois Orsini writes about how, for merger partners
plagued by subtle differences, it is critical to distinguish
between higher and lower values, as they will not lead to
the same kind of battles nor should they be examined during
the same stages of the M&A process.
“…In the world of
business, there are higher values that are stressed by
some corporations but not by others…companies place
their highest values on benchmarks ranging from good engineering
to well-managed human resources policies to robust return
on investment. These highest values are ‘strategic
values.’ But corporation also have lower values that
may be called ‘tactical values.’
...Strategic values are stable
and nonnegotiable. Therefore, their identification needs
to be made during the due diligence process…care
should be taken to ensure that here are not differences
between the formally announced strategic values and the
strategic values that actually are practiced in the corporation.
…The integration phase
that deals with culture differences resolution needs to
be an exercise in negotiation that pivots on the good reasons
why some differences should survive.”
|